Lying Fight For The Future Activates Campaigns Without Knowledge Or Consent – LibertyColumns.com Leaves Internet Defense League

Dear Visitors:

It is with great anger that I resign from Fight From The Future’s “Internet Defense League” for initiating Socialist National Internet aka “Net Neutrality” campaigns on my Web sites without my knowledge or consent.

When I signed up for the Internet Defense League when it started, I was informed that campaigns would be made known to me in advance via e-mail, and I could opt-out of campaigns by removing code from my sites.

Fortunately I managed to remove the Internet Defense League code from two of my three sites after they did this to me once. However, I had restored the code on my third site out of convenience, as I was not aware that Fight For The Future would have been running various campaign graphics until the Obama/Boehner Socialist National Internet will be realized in our lifetime. As the majority of conservatives and libertarians have given in under pressure a Socialist National Internet aka “Net Neutrality” is likely to occur.

I urge everyone to not only resign from the Internet Defense League, but also to write Fight For The Future about this deplorable misuse of very benevolent technology.

Thank you,

LibertyColumns.com / danq.co / coredumpcentral.org

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why Conservatives Must Stand With #GamerGate

A fight has been occurring for months now, by concerned individuals, in an attempt to expose bias, dishonesty, collusion, conflict of interest, and other forms of corrupt and unethical behavior in the corporate media, and are being accused of “hate speech” and “intolerance” as they fight for their culture.

No, I am not referring to conservatives. Few of these individuals are conservatives.

They are gamers, who are now facing their culture under attack by the liberal mainstream media, and are being censored on blogs and discussion groups.

One of the first attempts at exposing corruption involved a woman named Zoe Quinn. A positive review for her game came from an individual named Nathan Grayson, who was in a casual sexual relationship with her.

This makes any effort to attack bias in Web 2.0 blogs, many of which have since been sold to Mainstream Media 1.0 companies such as Conde Nast, an effort to support “hate speech” in the “war on women”.

 
 
Censorship on Gitorious.org

Censorship on Gitorious.org

 
 

Gamers are facing censorship on a number of their favorite sites, including 4chan and Conde-Nast-owned Reddit (of which Zoe Quinn is an administrator of many groups). On Reddit, where moderators have been threatened with false child pornography complaints if they don’t follow orders, only a few designated message boards are allowed to post pro-GamerGate messages. Are we headed to a world of Liberal-Only Lunch Counters? Recall NY Governor Andrew Cuomo’s comments that “extreme conservatives…have no place in the State of New York.”

 
 
GamerGate Flow Chart

GamerGate Flow Chart

 
 

There have been threats and harassment involved, much of which has been motivated by sexism. However, there are evil people everywhere, and to blame this on thousands of people opposed to media bias is far worse.

As conservatives, we have an obligation to support GamerGate, including the liberals in the movement. Conservatives saw multiculturalism destroy the American melting pot, resulting in most of the country lacking any form of cultural identity. Multiculturalism has robbed Americans of their very being, turning us all into mechanical robots, and multiculturalism is no doubt partly responsible for the rise in depression, suicide rates, and drug abuse. We cannot let this happen to anyone else.

Regardless of gamers’ liberalism and the violence of a few, conservatives need to stand with GamerGate, and help them win *their* culture war, knowing firsthand the consequences of losing.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Apologies about the Cat Signal.

I was not notified it would include this campaign. It is gone for the time being.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Net Neutrality: Eight Quotes Proving Internet Regulation During Obama/Boehner Era Dangerous

It’s everywhere. All over Twitter, #OccupyFCC. Even on the discussion boards of Tea Party Nation. There is no avoiding the fact that the world supports new Internet regulation in light of the FCC’s decision that companies are permitted to pay ISPs for priority access.

I have warned several times on my blog about how regulation of the Internet right now is a bad idea. In fact, my entire blog is full of examples on regulation of anything right now is a bad idea.

Rather than repeat my comments, I will list eight quotes proving what happens when we let Congress and the FCC come up with their definition of “neutral”. While you read these quotes, keep in mind what “net neutrality regulation” is – regulation.

 
 

“With the FCC already promising exceptions from net neutrality for copyright-enforcement, we fear that 2010 could be the year when the FCC’s idea of an ‘Open Internet’ proves quite different from what many have been hoping for.”

 
 
     -Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2010 (source)
 
 
 
 

“And, you know, that typical politician smile he [an unnamed US senator] had suddenly faded from his face, and his eyes started burning this fiery red. And he started shouting at me, said, ‘Those people on the Internet, they think they can get away with anything! They think they can just put anything up there, and there’s nothing we can do to stop them! They put up everything! They put up our nuclear missiles, and they just laugh at us! Well, we’re going to show them! There’s got to be laws on the Internet! It’s got to be under control!'”

 
 
-Aaron Swartz (1986-2013) (source)
 
 
 
 

“Thanks to important bipartisan compromises, we’ve put together a strong bill [to protect “real reporters”] that balances the need for national security with that of a free press.”

 
 
-Chuck Schumer (D-NY), 2013 (source)
 
 
 
 

“…the U.K. Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Internet Referral Unit has been using its ‘super flagger’ authority to seek reviews – and removal – of videos it considers extremist. The news sparked concern that Google lets the U.K. government censor videos that it doesn’t like, and prompted Google to disclose more details about the program.”

 
 
-Wall Street Journal, 2014 (source)
 
 
 
 

“When Private Bradley [aka Chelsea] Manning put his conscience ahead of his personal well-being by allegedly releasing important information to the world’s public via WikiLeaks, he was put into an inhumane solitary confinement and is now facing charges that carry the possibility of him spending the rest of his life in prison.”

 
 
-Ray McGovern, Antiwar.com, 2011 (source)
 
 
 
 

“By harboring this known cybercriminal [Edward Snowden] they pose a clear and present danger to the American people. I don’t want to hear about extradition or rendition or any of that nonsense. This man is a traitor and if we don’t get him within 24 hours I say we need to start bombing the hell out of Hong Kong…We could probably destroy their infrastructure and occupy the entire country by the end of the week.”

 
 
John McCain (RINO-AZ), 2013 (source)
 
 
 
 

“The medicine prescribed by the Messenger of Allah is the execution of those involved [in the “Everybody Draw Mohammed Day” Facebook protests of 2010.]”

 
 
-Anwar al-Awlaki, Al’Qaeda terrorist (1971-2011) (source)
 
 
 
 
And to sum it all up, Number 8 (emphasis mine):
 
 
 
 

“A Russia-led proposal calling for sweeping new governmental powers to regulate cyberspace could enable countries to block Web content and wrest control of allotment of Internet addresses from a U.S.-based body. The proposal, co-signed by China, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Sudan and the United Arab Emirates…to rewrite a long-standing treaty on international communications…a leaked draft of the Russia-led proposals would give countries equal rights to manage the Internet including in regard to the allotment, assignment and reclamation of Internet numbering. This could allow governments to render websites within their borders inaccessible, even via proxy servers or other countries. It also could allow for multinational pacts in which countries could terminate access to websites at one another’s request.”

 
 
-Reuters, December 9, 2012 (source)
 
 
 
 
Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

I have disabled the Cat Signal for the Net Neutrality campaign…

…as I do not trust the current federal government’s unelected bureaucrats to regulate the Internet. Read more about the dangers of Net Neutrality here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

StopTheSecrecy.net – Stop the Secret TPP!


For more info on the dangers of the secret TPP, read this.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on StopTheSecrecy.net – Stop the Secret TPP!

Internet Sales Tax: If Republicans Can Defy The Supreme Court, Why Not On Abortion?

The Internet Sales Tax proposal, backed by (often-rightfully) dying brick-and-mortar establishments and bloated state governments, will force any individual or business who sells a product online to collect sales taxes in any jurisdiction. There are 9,600 state and local systems of taxation which any individual who wishes to sell a product online will have to comprehend, and the consumers of online products will pay.

In 1992, the Supreme Court ruled in Quill Corps v. North Dakota that Internet sales taxes can only be levied if the seller has a physical presence in the same state as the buyer.

In defiance of the Supreme Court, both Democrats and Republicans are promoting the “Marketplace ‘Fairness’ Act”, appealing to the “fairness” promoted by liberals and Occupy Wall Street protesters (along the lines of “fair trade” and “Fairness Doctrine”). Supporters of the Left’s concept of “fairness” are also exploiting nostalgic feelings of “your favorite store”, which are among the numerous anti-capitalist tactics the Hollywood Mafia has used to outlaw, attempt to outlaw, or regulate in their favor every new technology since the piano roll.

In the past, Congress sought constitutional amendments when the Supreme Court ruled something unconstitutional. This is why we have a Sixteenth Amendment – the Supreme Court ruled in 1895 that direct income tax was unconstitutional, and a change was required to add that ability to the federal government.

As if Washington’s epidemic of selective enforcement of self-interpreted laws wasn’t bad enough, never mind their blatant disregard for freedom in general, Congress is now, in the same vein as the Russian government’s permitting perpetual terms for Putin, defying the Supreme Court and the Constitution.

But if Republicans are to defy the Supreme Court on a taxation issue, why not defy the Supreme Court on their sanctioned genocide of millions of unwanted American individuals, that is, abortion?

Abortion has killed over 53 million individuals, a death toll equivalent to at least eight Holocausts. Republicans have promised for decades to outlaw this domestic genocide, yet have only given conservatives a few breadcrumbs.

Why are Republicans allowing this? Because Republican politicians are all pro-choice. The medical establishment, which funds all politicians of both parties, supports abortion. Big Pharma gets more money for every individual they abort, in the same manner that technologically incompetent retailers make money with every new item they sell. And just like Occupy Wall Street’s “Fairness” taxes, legalized abortion and its accompanying lie of “freedom of choice” enables Big Pharma to make more money.

Republican politicians are some of the most vocal promoters of abortion, and many fall victim to their tricks. Here are several of the tricks Republican politicians use to mislead Republican voters:

  1. Trade Agreements Are Only About Trade. Notice how Latin American countries have been legalizing abortion one-by-one in recent years? We have Bush II’s CAFTA (Central American Free Trade Agreement), supported by Bush II’s bicameral Republican Congress, to thank for this.
  2. “Repeal Roe v Wade” (or, the Paul Family Con). Here we have people like Ron & Rand Paul who claim to be pro-life, but want abortion to be a “states’ rights issue”. Like slavery, states would decide who qualifies as a full, partial, or non-person, and like Jim Crow, who would be separate and who would be equal.
  3. Establishment Platform Plank Scam. Popular among Mitt Romney, Chris Christie, and others in the Republican elite who have the final say in the Republican platform. Here legalized abortion is encouraged in cases of rape or incest. In other words, legalizing the killing of an individual when the individual’s birth and/or any associated consequences are unwanted – the pro-choice justification for legalizing all abortions.
  4. Catholic District Doublespeak. “I’m pro-life but the woman should decide”, “I will vote pro-life regardless of my personal views”, etc. This garbage has long been popular among Democrats, and now Republicans are starting to pull this too.
  5. Hidden Gas Chambers. This involves legislation to make abortion more “humane”, as how the electric chair was replaced by the gas chambers. Examples include banning only partial-birth abortions and pumping in anesthesia before the abortion.

America is on a dangerous path, and if Congress and the President are allowed to defy the Supreme Court by fiat, America will become a nightmare. If our anti-new-company, anti-individual-freedom government will be using Occupy Wall Street “fairness” tactics to make the American economy less free, tomorrow it can be Putin-style infinite terms and Chinese-style amputation of rebellious workers’ arms.

And if it must be this way, we must demand that Republican politicians outlaw abortion, or they will be exposed as pro-choice liars, which intelligent Republican voters know they already are.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment